is not always the rule to delete the new img not previous one
my img was better quality and have about 6 weeks in MT
or it was just deleted by cause d person that submited was a MOD ?
and really want to know the reason i believed that is not fair to the rest of
the regular users
to submit scan that i work to created a textless vercion and then after a weeks
it deleted by a less quality ver. Shakugan no Eyes by
Hanedas
Quote:
original message
Your submission entitled Shakugan no Eyes was removed from Minitokyo because it
was exactly identical to a previously posted image.
-Only in the event that your version was of significantly higher quality and/or
provided a better description, which was deemed not the case, would the previous
image have been deleted.
Please browse the image galleries prior to uploading images.
Sincerely,
Minitokyo Staff
This is an automated message and cannot be replied.
Are you honestly trying to say that your scan is better quality than the one
that is in the galleries now? you have got to be kidding. Not only your version
is of less resolution but it also has had it's colors altered by saturating them
and has been poorly compressed so it contains jpeg artifact which can be seen in
all the outlines. While the one that remains in our galleries has non of those
problems and is of higher resolution.
The fact that it was submitted by a mod has absolutely nothing to do with this
and to even try to suggest is a joke.
Please do an honest comparison before attempting to complain. Closed.
is not always the rule to delete the new img not previous one
my img was better quality and have about 6 weeks in MT
or it was just deleted by cause d person that submited was a MOD ?
and really want to know the reason i believed that is not fair to the rest of the regular users
to submit scan that i work to created a textless vercion and then after a weeks it deleted by a less quality ver.
Shakugan no Eyes by Hanedas
Her scan is much bigger (2,250x3,195) than yours (1,024x1,298), so usually the bigger scan stays regardless of which scan was submitted first.
Are you honestly trying to say that your scan is better quality than the one that is in the galleries now? you have got to be kidding. Not only your version is of less resolution but it also has had it's colors altered by saturating them and has been poorly compressed so it contains jpeg artifact which can be seen in all the outlines. While the one that remains in our galleries has non of those problems and is of higher resolution.
The fact that it was submitted by a mod has absolutely nothing to do with this and to even try to suggest is a joke.
Please do an honest comparison before attempting to complain. Closed.