That Signatures are that big coz members of S20 Signature Studio (as me). We use
them cause we refuse to conform the system, as Devil-san said
Hope it's help
If you wanna more info please visit the group S20 Signature Studio
Yes, naomi-akiyama's right. Besides, this isn't [sigimg], since the general
image size wouldn't let you upload such image. They use [img] instead. So don't
worry, this isn't a bug
Naomi-chan's is kinda too big IMO, but i think it should be the case, if it does
bother that much, turning off the full view option would be another option. I
like it better when the sigs are slightly larger, at least more artistic designs
can be entered into the sig, which is what we do at S2O
To clarify, signature images must use the sigimg
tag, and the maximum size for all
signature images is 468x60 pixels. This is non-negotiable, and as such
all members with signatures that violate these guidelines are to make sure that
their signatures do meet these standards as soon as possible.
Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
While we're at it, can sheqel please fix the tags in the signatures so that
[img] cannot be used for sig images? That'll remove the loophole in the site
architecture.
I thought sig image size was 468x60, the past weeks i've seen many users with sig images really above this limits.
Not that i dislike their work, but those big images really messes up MT style while browsing.
And i do prefer to see other members sigs, some are really nice.
Just saw one sig above 650 pixels width
Maybe it's me, but i remember that if you try to upload a bigger sigimg, system rejected it, maybe something is wrong, or maybe i'm?
That Signatures are that big coz members of S20 Signature Studio (as me). We use them cause we refuse to conform the system, as Devil-san said
Hope it's help
If you wanna more info please visit the group
S20 Signature Studio
Oo it was you... hmm, well, what can i say, i guess i'm not the one to judge.
But it really sucks to browse all the way down to read
Yes, naomi-akiyama's right. Besides, this isn't [sigimg], since the general image size wouldn't let you upload such image. They use [img] instead. So don't worry, this isn't a bug
In that case the img tag out to be outlawed from sigs as it used to in MT2. There was a reason for that, and I still believe in it.
I know, but we can't do much, you know?
Naomi-chan's is kinda too big IMO, but i think it should be the case, if it does bother that much, turning off the full view option would be another option. I like it better when the sigs are slightly larger, at least more artistic designs can be entered into the sig, which is what we do at S2O
To clarify, signature images must use the sigimg tag, and the maximum size for all signature images is 468x60 pixels. This is non-negotiable, and as such all members with signatures that violate these guidelines are to make sure that their signatures do meet these standards as soon as possible.
Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
While we're at it, can sheqel please fix the tags in the signatures so that [img] cannot be used for sig images? That'll remove the loophole in the site architecture.
There should be a way to resize automatically images using javascript... i remember doing something like that in vB.