After just finishing my Winter Quarter, I've had a little time more time to mull over some issues I've noticed in society. Upon finsihing Art 145: Art History there was a subject we discussed that caught my interest: censorship in art and the media. It would seem at times non-offensive works of art (or anything for that matter) were censored merely becuase they conflicted with someone else's relgious beliefs. This just struck me and I began to wonder about what truely deserves to be censored and what should be shown in public and who really has the final say.
Obviously anything pornographic or too extreme in violence for children to view are a few things that shouldn't have easy access.
I feel that some censorship is necessary to ensure that our society and world isn’t running rampant with distasteful images or things that could hurt the general public. I feel that if children cannot view the images, than the image itself should not be publicly shown or should be shown selectively. On the other hand, over censoring would be too extreme in that it would not allow any one to express how they feel or think and would severely hinder our society’s growth by not allowing any real progress or change.
What do you feel deserves to be viewed publically or should be hidden from the general view?
Or do you even feel censorship is necessary or not - do you feel it is legal or does it contradict our rights?
Please do tell.