Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /var/www/minitokyo/www/includes/common.inc.php on line 360 Nudity - Minitokyo

This thread is closed for posting.

page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next » 70 total items

DarkMaiden1369

DarkMaiden1369

.::Hopeless::.

Ok I'm kidna pissed that my scan was deleted --> <center>
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y199/darkmaiden1369/Pretty.jpg

I mean so whgat it shows a little bit nipple and its not liek its an obscene pic... Ive seen otehr scans way more obscene or that show nipples
Examples: here, here, here, They barely have clothes on, here, So wait if i have a wet t-shirt over it its ok >__>, once again just has a shirt over it but i can still see it ><,

I'm sure there are more but I dont have all day to look through the damn galleries^^ I just want to make my point that there are other scans... >__>

Signature Image
You shattered all the hopes and dreams I never had.....

Heh

I totally agree

some of my scans have been deleted also, but it's no use, watcha gonna do : /

Kuzain

eeto...uumo...

I thought it was a good scan.
I don't like the fact that American society has a problem with breasts. It's sexist, it's wrong, and it hurts the development of young girls.

That being said, your scan does show more than breasts. And even if it didn't, minitokyo has a right to decide what goes on their site and what doesn't.

I guess what I'm trying to say is I wouldn't have deleted your scan, but a minitokyo mod has the right too and people should stop worrying about boobs so much.

~*Signature
	Image*~
Osaka-san!

SilentMasamune

SilentMasamune

I'm all washed up. . .

There are plenty of overlooked scans that have some nudity in them. Personally, I don't have a problem with slight exposure, but I guess that there are some people who take this too seriously.

Signature Image
Support Limerock Cafe - full feature forum and gallery

I agree. I have no problem with banning things like sex, but banning breasts is not fair at all really. I mean, it's if the shirt is 2mm over to the left for example it is fine because nipple is not shown, but 2mm right it gets banned coz it shows nipple. I think MT shoudl rethink their rules slightly, and allow mild nudity for sure.

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

Meteorain

Meteorain

Celestial Judgement

hmm, that's true, but the thing is...the whole breast is bare I think. Personally there's nothing wrong with it, and there other are more ecchi.

This signature violates the signature guidelines, thus it has been removed.

Kuzain

eeto...uumo...

Quote by knightyI agree. I have no problem with banning things like sex, but banning breasts is not fair at all really. I mean, it's if the shirt is 2mm over to the left for example it is fine because nipple is not shown, but 2mm right it gets banned coz it shows nipple. I think MT shoudl rethink their rules slightly, and allow mild nudity for sure.

Especially since shirtlessness would be tolerated in a male. But does Minitokyo actually ban bare breasts? This scan has more than that in it so the nipple may not be why it was banned.

~*Signature
	Image*~
Osaka-san!

But I've seen others be banned for nipple, and there isn't much else is there? 'tis barely visible hehe. I think that scan is fine.

EDIT: Maybe an admin could enlighten us a little more on the rules here? I remember reading the definition of pornography it gave and there was nothing bannign nudity. Just banning sexual oppresion and abuse.

EDIT 2: I forgot to say that scan is incredibly beautiul too. Neko pics own :P

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

TimothytheDarkMagician

TimothytheDarkMagician

The True Dark Magician

They should just have left you pic I've seen some really obscene ones that I'm suprised they kept on.... you should send them an angry e-mail!!!!..... yeah angry e-mails rule!!!!

Signature Image

DarkMaiden1369

DarkMaiden1369

.::Hopeless::.

http://gallery.minitokyo.net/view/111829/?success well here's the same scan i sumitted EDITEd... >__> it all
plus those scnas i found that show nipples , i mean come on if it has a wet t-shirt over it and stiill shows it then it hsould be deleted liek mine but no especailly when a mod submits the scan...

Signature Image
You shattered all the hopes and dreams I never had.....

Angry email = ban = worse. Flaming is no way to go about things TtDM. Anyway, I'll just wait for an admin to come and enlighten us.

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

Meteorain

Meteorain

Celestial Judgement

if that's the problem...then just draw a wet T-shirt upon the scan and submit. But I do think some of the rules can be revised, but I won't press that point any further.

This signature violates the signature guidelines, thus it has been removed.

Kuzain

eeto...uumo...

That's a shame if there have been scans that were banned for having a nipple in it. I would expect an art community to be a bit more enlightened on the subject. On the other hand, some people could be browsing in a place where they might get in trouble for an image like that (which I think is foolish unless the image is sexual), but maybe a way to warn someone that it contains some nudity (even though it would be sexist to do that for topless females and not topless males it's better than nothing) could solve that problem.

~*Signature
	Image*~
Osaka-san!

I dunno why your catgirl scan was deleted! I thought it was real pretty! But I do agree with your point, Liz! Some images or wallies that have great quality and show how a woman's body is depicted in nude should be allowed, imo! Besides, I seen far more perverted and obscene scans on MT's latest submissions sent by one member! (*coughhamtarocough*) >_>

If people are worried about browsing here and getting into trouble, breasts dont effect it much really. The pics here are sexual enough without nipples, which would make no difference.

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

Meteorain

Meteorain

Celestial Judgement

Quote by KuzainThat's a shame if there have been scans that were banned for having a
nipple in it. I would expect an art community to be a bit more
enlightened on the subject. On the other hand, some people could be
browsing in a place where they might get in trouble for an image like
that (which I think is foolish unless the image is sexual), but maybe a
way to warn someone that it contains some nudity (even though it would
be sexist to do that for topless females and not topless males it's
better than nothing) could solve that problem.

Lol I do not think a topless male, quite constitues pronography in a way that a topless woman does. >_<

This signature violates the signature guidelines, thus it has been removed.

Technically though, why not?

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

Barbara

Tomorrow is another day

I think your scan is good quality and very nice. It should not be deleted but it had happened, sorry though :(

To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world
- Bill Wilson -

Meteorain

Meteorain

Celestial Judgement

because a man's chest is bare, and a woman has breats. Breats insite lust and stuff like that hence they are classified as being pronograpic. C'mon does anyone find a man's chest sexually stimulating? >_<

This signature violates the signature guidelines, thus it has been removed.

Kuzain

eeto...uumo...

Quote by Meteorain

Quote by KuzainThat's a shame if there have been scans that were banned for having a
nipple in it. I would expect an art community to be a bit more
enlightened on the subject. On the other hand, some people could be
browsing in a place where they might get in trouble for an image like
that (which I think is foolish unless the image is sexual), but maybe a
way to warn someone that it contains some nudity (even though it would
be sexist to do that for topless females and not topless males it's
better than nothing) could solve that problem.

Lol I do not think a topless male, quite constitues pronography in a way that a topless woman does. >_<


Quote by Meteorain
because a man's chest is bare, and a woman has breats. Breats insite lust and stuff like that hence they are classified as being pronograpic. C'mon does anyone find a man's chest sexually stimulating?

Then you are sexist. There's nothing sexual about it that you have not placed there. The Taliban thought a woman's face was obscene and sexual, should we ban pictures with a woman's face in them? If we relaxed the laws regarding bare breasts, within a generation it would not be a big deal and if anything, there'd be less sexual tension.

~*Signature
	Image*~
Osaka-san!

No but I'm sayign that technically, all a woman has is mans breasts but larger. They do have different genetic make up, and I know of course what your saying! I'm just going by technicalities.

EDIT: Amen to that Kuzain. Well pointed out and said.

~knighty

Member of:
MT UK

Tama-Neko

Tama-Neko

Invisible

From the FAQ

Quote:
What is 'mature content'?
» Mature Content is deemed as being works of an explicit sexual or adult nature. This includes submissions with nudity, which is defined as genitalia and nipples for females. Excessive cursing in a submission may also be deemed 'Mature'. Submissions with mature content will be immediately removed from Minitokyo


Guys. This has always been the case ever since the removal of the hentai gallery a year ago. No nipples on female scans. End of story.
If you find other scans which go against this policy, then by all means report them! Mods can't go through all 50,000 pictures with a fine-toothed comb! That's what the reporting function is there for!

Meteorain

Meteorain

Celestial Judgement

Eh I am not sexist. But in a westernised community, women's breats incite a lot more lust than a man's chest, hence that is why it is classified as pornography. There is nothing sexist in stating that.

This signature violates the signature guidelines, thus it has been removed.

Kuzain

eeto...uumo...

Quote by Tama-NekoFrom the FAQ

Quote:
What is 'mature content'?
» Mature Content is deemed as being works of an explicit sexual or adult nature. This includes submissions with nudity, which is defined as genitalia and nipples for females. Excessive cursing in a submission may also be deemed 'Mature'. Submissions with mature content will be immediately removed from Minitokyo


Guys. This has always been the case ever since the removal of the hentai gallery a year ago. No nipples on female scans. End of story.
If you find other scans which go against this policy, then by all means report them! Mods can't go through all 50,000 pictures with a fine-toothed comb! That's what the reporting function is there for!

I think the point was more that there is an objection to nipples on a female scan being considered nudity while male nipples are not.

Quote by metorianEh I am not sexit. But in a westernised community, women's breats incite a lot more lust than a man's chest, hence that is why it is classified as pornography. There is nothing sexist in stating that.

As I said, within a gneration it would not be an issue. Men's chests are not sexualized because they may be seen. In afghanistan, a woman's face was sexualized because it sould not be seen. It's all a matter of what you try to hide away.

~*Signature
	Image*~
Osaka-san!

page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next » 70 total items

Back to Minitokyo Discussions | Active Threads | Forum Index

Only members can post replies, please register.

Warning: Undefined array key "cookienotice" in /var/www/minitokyo/www/html2/footer.html on line 73
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Read more.