and no I'm not being sarcastic. Everyone loves to jump on the bandwagon of Bush-bashing, even those who don't
really know anything - assuming that he is an incompetent president. Granted, Bush has been quite/uh, very disappointing
at times and his speeches (often flagrant - e.g. "axis of evil" "Kiim JongIl is a pygmy") have even
left schoolchildren perplexed (e.g. "...the country of Africa!").. one of the things he is perpetually
ridiculed for.
But does it all really warrant the type of demeaning criticism he faces? Has Bush really achieved nothing during his presidency? The fact that he was re-elected must mean something.. no?
I feel like it's often too easy to focus on the bad side of things (i.e. those endless depressing threads) when
compared to many others, we don't have it as bad as we make it out to be.
So here's an opportunity to attempt to appreciate this hard-to-appreciate guy Bush and his achievements. (whatever they may be.) To flat out say that he's stupid or something is really not going to promote any sort of discussion here.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Possible responses I came up with:
-Bush is better looking than Clinton XD
More seriously,
-Some people also argue that Bush's strong sense of morals and adherence to his beliefs are his assets as a
president. Even though he may be strong-headed, perhaps that's not such a bad thing - as in, someone like Kerry
would have made a bad president.
-It can be argued that the Bush administration has made some progress in its War on Terror. They've tried to come
up with a comprehensive strategy to attack major terrorist groups - and even though the general European response was
lukewarm at best, the administration has managed to get the support of key Asian governments in this War on Terror. If
Asia is really on the rise, people argue that it is good to have these common grounds of ideology to help foster good
relations.