Quote by shoujoboy
The war on terrorism is a tough one to work with because for the first time we don't have a specific enemy, the
enemy is an idea or practice.
Shoujoboy is right on the money here. War on Terroism is like the War on Drugs, it will NEVER END. Pres. Bush has
expanded his "War" powers this way, and for an indefinite time! The War on Terroism can only be effective if
it's use in every situation. America ignores the genocide in Sudan, rape camps in Bosnia, and freedom of press in
China, shouldn't they be more consistent?
Quote by Kadath
It should go to the 1st terrorist nation of course. The one which has nuclear bombs. The one which has chemical weapons
and every kind of weapons of mass destruction. And it is well known for having used them many times on innocent
civilians. A nation that has almost always been in war in the last 60 years, both directly and by sponsorizing foreign
terrorists such as Bin Laden.
1st terrosim nation was Afghanistan. The one with nukes is Iran. Chemical weapons=Iran, Russia, Ukraine, India,
Pakistan, Japan, U.S., .... Government use force on civilians everywhere, what's so especial about Iraq?
"Support" Terroists? Remeber, Europe and US fostered these Terroists, does that count as support? Most nations
in the Middle East have them, by choice or not, does that count as support?
I would like to see a more stable Middle East. However, it doesn't seem like that can be accomplished withou 1
religion masscareing the rest. U.S. as well as the world in on thin ice with all the trouble it causes us. It's
just too much difference between them and us. Something/Someone needs to close the gap.