ok situations. first off we are not getting attacked by every living thing, so thats one diffrence of vietnam than iraq
because iraq is not attacking with women and children and anything they could find. Another, is that while in the iraq
war, we won by getting the stronghold, but in vietnam, there was no stronghold, the vietamnese would never stop intill
everyone of them were dead. Then while vietnam was to origionally help france, iraq was to get rid of terrorists and i
do not see that as a lie. We got rid of suddam and also he did have plans for WMD and he did use some on the kurds.
"I want the U.S. to leave Iraq alone...
So many people dying, both there and here, it's not fair.
This war in Iraq made lead to WW3, depending on how Politicians handle it."-Krisari
first off, about 3,000 US american troops have died, that is probably one of the lowest death counts ever in a war(yes i
know one death is bad, but what im saying is that for a war, this is extreamly low considering the war has been on for
about 2-3 years). And no this is not WWIII, the middle east does not have enough power to even start a world war. Also
poloticans are complete morans that care about money and nothing else(im not saying everyone of them are, but 98% of
them are).
" also remeber around that same time period everyone was supposed to be afraid of the commies now everyones
supposed to be afraid of the arabs."-shinsengumi89
again, first off, they want us to be scared of TERRORISTS, not arabs. In fact we have Iraq, Israel, turky, pakistan,
oman, Kuwait as allies which is alot of the middle east, and i bet there are more. So no they are'nt trying to get
us scared of arabs, its terrorists they want us to be concerned about.