That scan is beyond inappropriate.
Let me attempt to spell this out for anyone else who doesn't see this for what it is.
> She's 15 yrs old, tops. A quick search on Google of the series tells anyone that she is clearly underage. And
for anyone who has watched this series, I'm sure that's even more obvious.
> So this very much underage girl with large breasts stands there lifting up her sleepwear-shirt/slip with an intense
look of sexual submission on her face.
> And thanks to her excessively thin underwear, it is made evident that she is aroused.. labia majora. I can only
imagine the accentuation from the shadow only helps tickle the fantasies of sick little minds.
> So. An aroused underage school girl in sleepwear in a sexually suggestive
pose. Wow I just threw up a little in my mouth. You should too.
This may not seem egregiously pornographic at first glance, as she does look
like she could be older, and she's not flaunting bullet-sized nipples or barely-there underwear or otherwise
screaming out for leery-eyed attention. That doesn't change the fact that the 'labia majora' is still
grounds for deletion.
And not to state the obvious, but this being in the form of a drawing does not make this 'tame' or
'acceptable'. An explicit rape/murder scene in a movie and an explicit rape/murder scene in an anime clip are
both explicit rape/murder scenes. The visceral impact may not necessarily be equal, but when it comes to content, one is
not 'better' or 'worse' than the other.
Back to content. Can you imagine if a real 15 year old girl with the same googley eyes and 9 yr old face was
photographed in that outfit, in that pose, with the same signs of arousal? If a professional photographer took the
photo? Would any respectable publisher agree to publish it and call it 'beautiful'? Thats a rhetorical
question and the answer is NO. In fact, the photographer will suddenly find federal investigators jumping all over his
ass.
Even the infamous (most respected in its playing field though) PlayBoy magazine tries to make their shots artsy.
They're all about the admiration of the female body. You would not find that kind of submissive sexual look on an
aroused model/Playmate photo spread. Why? Because that's basically what porn is for, and they're not about to
be categorized as porn.
Likewise, MT will not be host to such images.
If this still does not make sense, I am happy to elaborate. Sheq is busy, do not bother him with nonsense like this.