As far as updating walls go, it actually takes a little while. It is honestly better to re-submit your revised work if
its new..
Normally, the issue with most people who make walls is that there are beginner errors of quality failure(poorly
rendered, bad scan, etc). You're already quite familiar in how things go, but that doesn't mean you're
invincible.
Even though, the overal quality is OK, there are some issues, especially when it comes to the finishing touches. This is
the reason why it got deleted. There were too many errors that could have easily been avoided.
For the moon; a moon is never blurry, not in any situation. Why? It's not a shape but a reflection of light of a
planetary orb close to our earth. We wouldn't see it if it wasn't for that. How come it is different from
normal objects? Surely, light shines on objects, etc but try to see if you can somehow blur out lights that will start
to look differently when it's dark. I can tell you, that doesn't happen cuz light happens. On to the wall the
fact that it's blurry indicates a poor brush or render used to buff up the quality by blur.
Not to mention, that if you are going to blur things out, wouldn't everything but the literal foreground have to be
quite blurry? Do you know of the Mona Lisa?al A perfect example. You can also try focusing on the bg or foreground of
something and you will notice that your eyes lose focus on one of them.
The wall ends abruptly because it became quite messy and out of control. Which might be because you used too many
objects.
The butterflies look kinda cheap. I mean, why did you use them in the first place? Does it fit the scene? Does it fiy
the behabiour of butterflies? Maybe you thought it was pretty. Either way, it is out of place and actually degrades the
entire composition by more than half. If you like, made them light emitting butterflies in the dark. Yes, that would be
nice but it's just there to fill up some space. Flowers or something instead would have also been nice. If you
wanted some colour, there were many options...so why butterflies?
Let's see what Panda thinks, since she was the one that deleted it. I'm not one to complain about her
judgement, since I basically agree.
Not looking at the follow up versions, I'm sure after following the critics, it is fine to stay in the gallery.
Sorry for talking so much and if the judgement was a bit too harsh. Don't feel offended, the base and wall is
there, the execution/final touches kind of failed. Hope my explanation helps you understand why it got removed.
