well... im nt sure whether tis came out before.. if it does, mods, ya noe wat to
do...
well... recently, the web filtering service of my internet service provider had
deemed MT a restricted site due to "pornographic" content, thanks to
those parents who reported MT as a pornographic site... those parents really
irritate me... they make a big fuss over scenes of gunfights on the television,
tried to stop kiddy grade from airing as they considered it pornographic...
tried to ban WWE as they find it is too violent.. etc..
wat r ur views on tis case on MT n the parents?
I must admit that there are certain scans that are quite borderline between
simple ecchiness and downright pornography. But, if they are allowed, then the
gallery directors did not deem such scans as "pornographic" since it
is explicitly against the rules.
But parents have a very legitimate concern. Even if a scan does not show
explicit content, the massive cleavages, panty shots, and suggestive poses
certainly are not for little kids to see. And since there isn't a "too
ecchi for a 5 year old" reporting option, the only thing they can use is
the pornographic content check box.
Though many webfilters have the ability for the enduser to custom set what to
filter out, so if MT is blocked, you can set a bypass for minitokyo.net
Parents are totally right, I have seen some scans that are pretty far from the
concept that MT really is. I'd say you should have a better control over the
images that come in to MT. And as EternalParadox says, even if it's not so as
obvious pornography, some scans show some pretty suggestive material.
But one might say: "You're old enough to not click there..." Yes, but
kids around 12 also watch this site, as far as I'm concerned, and it wouldn't be
very nice for them to see such graphics.
i think mt should put those almost porno pix in a separate gallery, and the
"recent pix" thingie in our right side shouldn't show the pix that are
in that gallery either, cuz some of us gurls find those annoying...
i would have to say there is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and
trust me there is none the site dose not allow it also the parent should look at
he site and go throu it befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty
shot i man good lord come on people what r they thinkin like they have never
looked at some ones pantes
Quote by kawaiishi think mt should put
those almost porno pix in a separate gallery, and
the "recent pix" thingie in our right side shouldn't show the pix
that
are in that gallery either, cuz some of us gurls find those
annoying...
I think that is a very good suggestion. Recent submissions should be filtered so
that young members do not see the more explicit content. May be you can send in
a support inquiry or start a suggestions thread to let the gallery directors
know.
Edit:
Quote by zenamasi would have to say there
is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and trust me there is none the
site dose not allow it also the parent should look at he site and go throu it
befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty shot i man good lord come
on people what r they thinkin like they have never looked at some ones
pantes
Just becuase you have nothing against seeing panties does not mean that parent
don't have a right to be concerned with the content that their children see on
the internet. And yes, many young children have never seen someone else's
panties, despite what you'd think. I fully support the parents on this issue. It
is important to have a safeguard for children, and thus I also advocate
kawaiish's suggestion.
well who cares? hentai and such is a part anime and manga, every otaku should
know this...
btw, from a otakus pov scans on this site are not porn or hentai
and parents don't understand, and they don't need to, and they don't need to
interfere either
Quote by LimefreakOk you know what i
think i think that all ecchi should be banned cause
i mean cmon it practically is porn ....
Ecchi isn't porn.
But the parents have all the right to decide what level of content their
children can see.
After all, they can just set Minitikyo to "sllow" if they deem the
site okay.
Quote by zenamasi would have to say there
is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and trust me there is none the
site dose not allow it also the parent should look at he site and go throu it
befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty shot i man good lord come
on people what r they thinkin like they have never looked at some ones
pantes
yeah...lets say like you go to a place where you can swim...the beach..you see
maney girls who have bikinis on and etc...whats the proplem if its just in
cartoon?...i mean like does there parents say NO DONT LOOK AT THE GIRL or
what?....
bikini= like a somthing thin covering the body and som places like
breast...etc...
and if it is anime...you see a girls panties....whats the bug deal?...i mean
thats just cartoon.....the parents should do somthing againt there children
watching real girls then...and not cartoon.....
Quote by zenamasi would have to say there
is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and trust me there is none the
site dose not allow it also the parent should look at he site and go throu it
befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty shot i man good lord come
on people what r they thinkin like they have never looked at some ones
pantes
yeah...lets say like you go to a place where you can swim...the beach..you see
maney girls who have bikinis on and etc...whats the proplem if its just in
cartoon?...i mean like does there parents say NO DONT LOOK AT THE GIRL or
what?....
bikini= like a somthing thin covering the body and som places like
breast...etc...
and if it is anime...you see a girls panties....whats the bug deal?...i mean
thats just cartoon.....the parents should do somthing againt there children
watching real girls then...and not cartoon.....
totally right dude, even if they watch real girls, there is nothing wrong, I
mean noone's getting hurt, is there?
There are a couple of scans here that are pretty ecchi to the extreme. Then
again there are like millions of submissions to the gallary that it is highly
unlikeley that you would find all of them. There are recent ones yeah sure but
that really doesn't justify calling Mt a pornograpihc site. There are tons of
other things here that make it family friendly well except for the occasional
perverted thread that is created.
Anime is like 80% ecchi. I've spoken with a lot of people about it and we
basically agreed that anime is pretty much an acceptable way of softcore porn.
Watching softporn is a no-no, but watching anime is ok. That's why anime is
called "cartoons for older kids".
Seriously, an anime girl who is lying on the floor with her butt upwards with
only panties on is as close to porn as it gets. It is only natural for parents
to consider some anime communities/websites to be inappropiate for little
children. They expect their kids to watch cartoons like the Looney Toons, Scooby
Doo, Teen Titans, etc. They don't want their kids to see Tenjou Tenge, Elfen
Lied, Love Hina, etc. Normally, I think that parents are overprotective with a
lot of stuff but I'll have to side with them on this one.
Quote by dutchforceNormally, I think
that
parents are overprotective with a lot of stuff but I'll have to side
with them on this one.
That's right.. and i don't get the problem.. maybe because here in italy i've no
sort of adult filter on my provider? if the community site is restricted what
sort of problem can arise?
Quote by zenamasi would have to say there
is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and trust me there is none the
site dose not allow it also the parent should look at he site and go throu it
befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty shot i man good lord come
on people what r they thinkin like they have never looked at some ones
pantes
yeah...lets say like you go to a place where you can swim...the beach..you see
maney girls who have bikinis on and etc...whats the proplem if its just in
cartoon?...i mean like does there parents say NO DONT LOOK AT THE GIRL or
what?....
bikini= like a somthing thin covering the body and som places like
breast...etc...
and if it is anime...you see a girls panties....whats the bug deal?...i mean
thats just cartoon.....the parents should do somthing againt there children
watching real girls then...and not cartoon.....
The difference between watching panty shots in anime and real girls on a pool is
that anime exaggerates on it. They really uses a lot of suggestive poses. They
zoom in on panties a lot too. So in the real world it's equivalent to looking at
girls with binoculars, which would really piss the parents off... ^__^
There are a number of scans on MT that have girls with nothing but panties on
and also pointing their fingure at certain areas of their body. It is such
suggestive connotations that really take the ecchiness to the extreme. I'm sure
if all of you have kids you wouldn't want your 5 year old to look at a girl
pointing at her crotch and licking her fingures and has that "come and get
me" look, real life or not. That's the stuff parents are concerned with and
I totally agree with them.
Quote by dutchforceAnime is like 80%
ecchi. I've spoken with a lot of people about it and we basically agreed that
anime is pretty much an acceptable way of softcore porn. Watching softporn is a
no-no, but watching anime is ok. That's why anime is called "cartoons for
older kids".
Seriously, an anime girl who is lying on the floor with her butt upwards with
only panties on is as close to porn as it gets. It is only natural for parents
to consider some anime communities/websites to be inappropiate for little
children. They expect their kids to watch cartoons like the Looney Toons, Scooby
Doo, Teen Titans, etc. They don't want their kids to see Tenjou Tenge, Elfen
Lied, Love Hina, etc. Normally, I think that parents are overprotective with a
lot of stuff but I'll have to side with them on this one.
I must agree with your opinion. Parent's just do that because they don't want
their kids to exploited to those things at the early age but on how they rteact
is very overprotective.
Quote by dutchforceAnime is like 80%
ecchi. I've spoken with a lot of people about it and we basically agreed that
anime is pretty much an acceptable way of softcore porn. Watching softporn is a
no-no, but watching anime is ok. That's why anime is called "cartoons for
older kids".
Seriously, an anime girl who is lying on the floor with her butt upwards with
only panties on is as close to porn as it gets. It is only natural for parents
to consider some anime communities/websites to be inappropiate for little
children. They expect their kids to watch cartoons like the Looney Toons, Scooby
Doo, Teen Titans, etc. They don't want their kids to see Tenjou Tenge, Elfen
Lied, Love Hina, etc. Normally, I think that parents are overprotective with a
lot of stuff but I'll have to side with them on this one.
i say its like this....
a girl in swim suit is in a pose...in real life it whould be for the
parents=40%procent dude or somthing
and if it whould be anime...its whould be 70% procent...they in anime style its
to hars for the parents lol....
I sometime wonder parents trying to be overprotective. If some parents consider
MT pornographic then what about Hollywood putting out realistice and violent
films for children to watch. pg-17? How many theaters enforce that rule?
But then again, if parents set the rule then you have to obey while you live in
the house or you move out when you're old enough.
I think MT does need to change its policy for scans. SOme of teh scans are right
on the line of pornography. I have no idea why they are there. I don't think
everyone will ever use them for walls and such.
However, the parents are being too protective. If they would just spend some
time with their children, they won't need to be worrying about their children
turning bad. (I do agree that WWE is too violent and stupid, and it should be
banned)
adult filtering are getting more and more attention these days because there are
more and more sites out there that adult base I don't believe that MT is close
to those sites
well... im nt sure whether tis came out before.. if it does, mods, ya noe wat to do...
well... recently, the web filtering service of my internet service provider had deemed MT a restricted site due to "pornographic" content, thanks to those parents who reported MT as a pornographic site... those parents really irritate me... they make a big fuss over scenes of gunfights on the television, tried to stop kiddy grade from airing as they considered it pornographic... tried to ban WWE as they find it is too violent.. etc..
wat r ur views on tis case on MT n the parents?
well MT does have pornographic scans and such
I must admit that there are certain scans that are quite borderline between simple ecchiness and downright pornography. But, if they are allowed, then the gallery directors did not deem such scans as "pornographic" since it is explicitly against the rules.
But parents have a very legitimate concern. Even if a scan does not show explicit content, the massive cleavages, panty shots, and suggestive poses certainly are not for little kids to see. And since there isn't a "too ecchi for a 5 year old" reporting option, the only thing they can use is the pornographic content check box.
Though many webfilters have the ability for the enduser to custom set what to filter out, so if MT is blocked, you can set a bypass for minitokyo.net
Parents are totally right, I have seen some scans that are pretty far from the concept that MT really is. I'd say you should have a better control over the images that come in to MT. And as EternalParadox says, even if it's not so as obvious pornography, some scans show some pretty suggestive material.
But one might say: "You're old enough to not click there..." Yes, but kids around 12 also watch this site, as far as I'm concerned, and it wouldn't be very nice for them to see such graphics.
Andrew.
i think mt should put those almost porno pix in a separate gallery, and the "recent pix" thingie in our right side shouldn't show the pix that are in that gallery either, cuz some of us gurls find those annoying...
i would have to say there is no pornografic pics on here porn means nude and trust me there is none the site dose not allow it also the parent should look at he site and go throu it befor saying it pornografic just cus the saw a panty shot i man good lord come on people what r they thinkin like they have never looked at some ones pantes
I think that is a very good suggestion. Recent submissions should be filtered so that young members do not see the more explicit content. May be you can send in a support inquiry or start a suggestions thread to let the gallery directors know.
Edit:
Just becuase you have nothing against seeing panties does not mean that parent don't have a right to be concerned with the content that their children see on the internet. And yes, many young children have never seen someone else's panties, despite what you'd think. I fully support the parents on this issue. It is important to have a safeguard for children, and thus I also advocate kawaiish's suggestion.
Ok you know what i think i think that all ecchi should be banned cause
i mean cmon it practically is porn ....
well who cares? hentai and such is a part anime and manga, every otaku should know this...
btw, from a otakus pov scans on this site are not porn or hentai
and parents don't understand, and they don't need to, and they don't need to interfere either
can you just explain me why? Maybe as a privite message if it's not the right place and if you agree...
Ecchi isn't porn.
But the parents have all the right to decide what level of content their children can see.
After all, they can just set Minitikyo to "sllow" if they deem the site okay.
yeah...lets say like you go to a place where you can swim...the beach..you see maney girls who have bikinis on and etc...whats the proplem if its just in cartoon?...i mean like does there parents say NO DONT LOOK AT THE GIRL or what?....
bikini= like a somthing thin covering the body and som places like breast...etc...
and if it is anime...you see a girls panties....whats the bug deal?...i mean thats just cartoon.....the parents should do somthing againt there children watching real girls then...and not cartoon.....
totally right dude, even if they watch real girls, there is nothing wrong, I mean noone's getting hurt, is there?
There are a couple of scans here that are pretty ecchi to the extreme. Then again there are like millions of submissions to the gallary that it is highly unlikeley that you would find all of them. There are recent ones yeah sure but that really doesn't justify calling Mt a pornograpihc site. There are tons of other things here that make it family friendly well except for the occasional perverted thread that is created.
Anime is like 80% ecchi. I've spoken with a lot of people about it and we basically agreed that anime is pretty much an acceptable way of softcore porn. Watching softporn is a no-no, but watching anime is ok. That's why anime is called "cartoons for older kids".
Seriously, an anime girl who is lying on the floor with her butt upwards with only panties on is as close to porn as it gets. It is only natural for parents to consider some anime communities/websites to be inappropiate for little children. They expect their kids to watch cartoons like the Looney Toons, Scooby Doo, Teen Titans, etc. They don't want their kids to see Tenjou Tenge, Elfen Lied, Love Hina, etc. Normally, I think that parents are overprotective with a lot of stuff but I'll have to side with them on this one.
That's right.. and i don't get the problem.. maybe because here in italy i've no sort of adult filter on my provider? if the community site is restricted what sort of problem can arise?
The difference between watching panty shots in anime and real girls on a pool is that anime exaggerates on it. They really uses a lot of suggestive poses. They zoom in on panties a lot too. So in the real world it's equivalent to looking at girls with binoculars, which would really piss the parents off... ^__^
There are a number of scans on MT that have girls with nothing but panties on and also pointing their fingure at certain areas of their body. It is such suggestive connotations that really take the ecchiness to the extreme. I'm sure if all of you have kids you wouldn't want your 5 year old to look at a girl pointing at her crotch and licking her fingures and has that "come and get me" look, real life or not. That's the stuff parents are concerned with and I totally agree with them.
its not full porn, the etchi tho can get really close in some cases
I must agree with your opinion. Parent's just do that because they don't want their kids to exploited to those things at the early age but on how they rteact is very overprotective.
i say its like this....
a girl in swim suit is in a pose...in real life it whould be for the parents=40%procent dude or somthing
and if it whould be anime...its whould be 70% procent...they in anime style its to hars for the parents lol....
I sometime wonder parents trying to be overprotective. If some parents consider MT pornographic then what about Hollywood putting out realistice and violent films for children to watch. pg-17? How many theaters enforce that rule?
But then again, if parents set the rule then you have to obey while you live in the house or you move out when you're old enough.
I think MT does need to change its policy for scans. SOme of teh scans are right on the line of pornography. I have no idea why they are there. I don't think everyone will ever use them for walls and such.
However, the parents are being too protective. If they would just spend some time with their children, they won't need to be worrying about their children turning bad. (I do agree that WWE is too violent and stupid, and it should be banned)
adult filtering are getting more and more attention these days because there are more and more sites out there that adult base I don't believe that MT is close to those sites