(Well , i think that i'm in the good forum , so so .... )
What do you think about the "state of the world" ? , because the
internationals relationships ,want to make a single state , a world state , and
that succeded at a "world president" and world institutions , ...
It'sn't my idea , i found the subject , in a very serious magazine about
geopolitics ...
First of all, "state of the world", do you mean the current events,
trends, relationship. or "state of the 'world'" , where it is a
futuristic notion of a single unified borderless concept. Please clarify!
If you are talking overall globalizatoin, I seriously doubt we will ever see a
"World Nation". Reason being the basic differences among nations
(politcal structures, laws, etc....) are not likely to be settled and they
definitely are not able to be pushed aside. Case and point is the actual amount
of power the UN itself has. In reality it has very little unless it is backed up
by the more powerful member nations.
First of all, "state of the world", do you mean the current events,
trends, relationship. or "state of the 'world'" , where it is a
futuristic notion of a single unified borderless concept. Please
clarify!
(Well , i think that i'm in the good forum , so so .... )
What do you think about the "state of the world" ? , because the
internationals relationships ,want to make a single state , a world state , and
that succeded at a "world president" and world institutions , ...
It'sn't my idea , i found the subject , in a very serious magazine about
geopolitics ...
I meant that the world state succeded to a world state without borders beetwen
countries ,and countries becomes regions well , in fact the system will resemble
has that of the United States, I want
to say, a federation system .... there will be a system of free exchange as
Shengen Space in europe ...
So , i think that is a very futuristic notion ,because i don't think that the
humans , are actually ready for cohabit , i mean differents persons of
differents countries .... .
The idea of a world state is completely insane. Other than some greatlly
effective tyrant conquering the planet there is no way any curent nations would
relinquish their sovreignty. Besides something about a "world state"
doesn't sit well with me, but that might just be because I'm something of an
anarchist.
Most people in the world are nationalistic in one shape or another. [Like 75%?
Just guessing.]
Different groups of people HATE each other. They'll tear each other apart or
tear the world state apart if it meddles with their conflict and then resume
killing each other.
No way a world state can really remain in control. Some group will take it down.
(Well , i think that i'm in the good forum , so so .... )
What do you think about the "state of the world" ? , because the internationals relationships ,want to make a single state , a world state , and that succeded at a "world president" and world institutions , ...
It'sn't my idea , i found the subject , in a very serious magazine about geopolitics ...
Your post confused me a bit.
First of all, "state of the world", do you mean the current events, trends, relationship. or "state of the 'world'" , where it is a futuristic notion of a single unified borderless concept. Please clarify!
If you are talking overall globalizatoin, I seriously doubt we will ever see a "World Nation". Reason being the basic differences among nations (politcal structures, laws, etc....) are not likely to be settled and they definitely are not able to be pushed aside. Case and point is the actual amount of power the UN itself has. In reality it has very little unless it is backed up by the more powerful member nations.
(Well , i think that i'm in the good forum , so so .... )
What do you think about the "state of the world" ? , because the internationals relationships ,want to make a single state , a world state , and that succeded at a "world president" and world institutions , ...
It'sn't my idea , i found the subject , in a very serious magazine about geopolitics ...
I meant that the world state succeded to a world state without borders beetwen countries ,and countries becomes regions well , in fact the system will resemble has that of the United States, I want
to say, a federation system .... there will be a system of free exchange as Shengen Space in europe ...
So , i think that is a very futuristic notion ,because i don't think that the humans , are actually ready for cohabit , i mean differents persons of differents countries .... .
if that were to happen, things'd be less confusing, with the currencies but rebellion would be a most likely problem
The idea of a world state is completely insane. Other than some greatlly effective tyrant conquering the planet there is no way any curent nations would relinquish their sovreignty. Besides something about a "world state" doesn't sit well with me, but that might just be because I'm something of an anarchist.
Most people in the world are nationalistic in one shape or another. [Like 75%? Just guessing.]
Different groups of people HATE each other. They'll tear each other apart or tear the world state apart if it meddles with their conflict and then resume killing each other.
No way a world state can really remain in control. Some group will take it down.
The people of this world are messed up. Thats all.