According to the botchii message I received, the wallpaper Broken was classified
as pornographic because it contained nudity. However, the definition of
pornography presented in the botchii notification is different than what was in
the Minitokyo Policy.
Quote by Minitokyo PolicyMinitokyo considers an image
to be mature content if it is explicity pornographic, contains scenes of sexual
acts, undressing, sexual poses, extreme violence, and any other imagery deemed
non-suitable for a family audience by the Minitokyo
staff.
Quote by botchii Message The image you submitted
entitled Broken was removed from Minitokyo, because it violated one or more of
the following policies:
- It featured hentai or pornography, which is not allowed in any form or shape.
This includes, but is not limited to: nudity, sexually inclined pictures or
explicit sexual pictures, bondage, sado masochism. Nude defines itself as
exposing nipples and/or genitals.
- Offensive contents, including racistical utterance, in any form or shape.
-Characters can not be seen in a state of undressing, or be posed provocatively.
I understand that nudity is generally associated with porn, but not all nudity
is pornographic. I am not asking for my wallpaper to be un-deleted because I do
understand your position, what I am asking is that you state in your policy that
nudes of any kind are not permitted. The policy seems to lean against
pornographic content only rather than the more general 'clothes on' policy that
seems to exist. I know some would point out that nudity is not 'family
friendly', however I was brought up to understand the difference between art and
porn, I was taught that the naked body can be beautiful and it is probably
because of that that I was under the impression that since the scan used did not
feature anything sexual it would be ok.
If you wish to review the image in question, it is posted at the following link:
Hosted on
SheezyArt
I am sorry about the misunderstanding, thank you for your time.
I'm almost certain that your wallpaper was deleted because of the character's
bare nipples which is definitely NOT family friendly. Yes, the human form can be
beautiful and is considered a work of art, but there are young members on this
site that may not understand that/do not need to be exposed to that yet.
According to the botchii message I received, the wallpaper Broken was classified as pornographic because it contained nudity. However, the definition of pornography presented in the botchii notification is different than what was in the Minitokyo Policy.
I understand that nudity is generally associated with porn, but not all nudity is pornographic. I am not asking for my wallpaper to be un-deleted because I do understand your position, what I am asking is that you state in your policy that nudes of any kind are not permitted. The policy seems to lean against pornographic content only rather than the more general 'clothes on' policy that seems to exist. I know some would point out that nudity is not 'family friendly', however I was brought up to understand the difference between art and porn, I was taught that the naked body can be beautiful and it is probably because of that that I was under the impression that since the scan used did not feature anything sexual it would be ok.
If you wish to review the image in question, it is posted at the following link: Hosted on SheezyArt
I am sorry about the misunderstanding, thank you for your time.
I'm almost certain that your wallpaper was deleted because of the character's bare nipples which is definitely NOT family friendly. Yes, the human form can be beautiful and is considered a work of art, but there are young members on this site that may not understand that/do not need to be exposed to that yet.