I just read the news, and an interesting headline revolves around the current, very polarized fight over the right of a party to conduct in a filibuster in the US Senate. The current bill is the vote on President Bush's judicial nominees.
Politics on those nominees aside, I personally find the filibuster a very non-productive mechanism that should be done away with. Rather than facilitating a debate on the actual issue itself, senators use the floor time to distract and hold out the issue so that they don't even have to vote on it. A notable example, Strom Thurmund of N. Carolina holds the longest filibuster record, over 24 hours. What did he do? Read the telephone directory.
I personally believe that the US senate has better ways to debate a bill and to support and block its passage than threatening to ramble on the floor on off the wall topics. That only divides the parties more, and it doesn't ever revolve on the issue at hand. In the current senate, no party has a 2/3 majority to override a filibuster, and thus the mere threat of one sharply veers the issue to the filibuster itself.
So what do you guys thing about the filibuster? Do you find it a necessary mechanism for the US Senate? Should Congress change it? Or do you find it a good and proper way to block passage of legislations?
And please refrain on such comments as "the American government s**ks." That does not facilitate the discussion that is the intent of this thread.