Well, I still buy CD's; I don't have an mp3 player yet. I was seriously considering getting one of the new video-playing
Ipods, but the whole compatibility wars thing makes me think twice. Think about it, if somebody comes out with a new
awesome mp3 player in the future to eclipse the Ipod, then anything you got off Itunes is going to all of a sudden be
worth jack, and you'll have to re-download all your stuff again, and pay for it again. Ditto if your hard drive
crashes.
I wouldn't have a problem at all paying $.99 for a track IF it was universally compatible. But between both the mp3
giants' format squabbles and the RIAA's increasingly draconian methods of trying to keep people from copying their legally purchased stuff, I'm getting a little disgusted with the way the music
distribution industry is going. I read an article in Maximum PC about several CDs (I think Faith Hill's was one of them)
with anti-copy "protection" that crashed almost all PC's they were put in; many of them would up needing
dealer repairs. That's just asenine; if all CD-player devices cannot play a CD, then it's not really a CD.
Quote by cyd84The real problem is
that the profits for most music get sucked up by music execs rather than artists...which is just
sad
Huge second on that- I don't know the numbers on what end percentage of the profits go to the artists, but if it's less
than 50% then the record companies should really take a hard look at how many "middlemen" it takes to do
distribution, licensing, legal battles, release scheduling and such. I mean, without the artists, they'd be out of a
job. Just my $0.02
:pacman: Sorry about the length, but yeah, this hit a nerve!