Man, I have to admit it, I felt in your cheap trap.
You just waited that someone with a minimum common sense posted here so you could rise yourself as the almigthy Champion
of the Own Cultural Frame and the Interculture Tolerance.
If it weren't that way, and given that you are so sure of your answer, you wouldn't have named the thread with
a question: "Going too far?" but "Castrated and loving it!" That would attracted more
people.
But you chose the wrong example. You haven't get the whole context.
First of all, you have to agree that the monk wasn't in his whole capacity of making such a decition. I don't
find the rigth word in English, but I'll stay with that description in order to not call him plainly
"insane". Let's grant him that if not for the little thing of the castration, he would have lived a
normal life.
But, because he wasn't, as we say in Mexico "completely in his five senses", that takes him out of any
cultural frame, and makes it a medical case in his land, in Germany, the States, China or whatever the place. What the
guy needed was phsyquiatric help.
If those monks were to castrate in order to reach perfection, it wouldn't had been in the news in the first place.
Perhaps in Ripley's, but not in the news. So, none can say he acted inside the normal cultural frame of his
people.
Now, indeed he's hurting and damaging other people. He has introduced doubt in his community. He's divided
opinions. Now wait until he advices younger monks to do the same.
If there were any people around his comunity who for whatever the reason wanted to discredit the monks, he has put a new
weapon in their hands. Now they are "radicals".
You can bet the simple and normal people that lived next to those monks are also divided and confused. It's called
"escandal". "Is that the way to reach perfection?" The CONSECUENCES of that incident won't
reach us, the hot thing has already passed, but that comunity is already hurt.
Any religious authority, IN ANY RELIGION, has to set an example, and that example includes to live with your healty
organs. Temptation is part of the game, and if he needed a crutch as mutilation to win over temptation, it's
because maybe being a monk wasn't his thing.
I know what I'm talking about because I have been a catequist for more that 18 years, and I have lived with my
thingies for my whole 33 years.
Because I talk of God to children, I can't be going to bed with whoever I find at the disco each weekend. And pay
attention to this words, because they're not easy to write for a man my age, even under a username: I'm still
a virgin, because I got caugth in this thing since I was a teen. I don't know if tomorrow I'll lose it, but I
hope to get to marriage this way (I don't care if my wife is virgin or not -what a hope!- this desition I apply it
to myself), if someone still wants my carcass then.
Now, having embarrased myself, let's consider other things.
Cultural frames have to be respected, I agree, but everything has a limit. Dictated by whom? By elemental COMMON SENSE
and Human Rigths.
How about the girls who get their external sex organs amputated, without anestesia and with infection guaranteed at age
five, in the small towns of Somalia? Respect that "cultural frame" for what? To fit men's cultural
perception of how a woman shold be? After each birth, they're sewed again. Those women suffer infection and pain
every month during almost their whole life.
How about child abuse in Southeast Asia? That started as a local problem, because in some cultures children are
iniciated in sex at early age. But now that pederast all over the world have discovered that, they have made it their
paradise. And children became prostitutes, exploted by mafias.
Should we leave those "cultural frames" alone? Now that's a good and real question, instead of
"Going too far?"