Define life.
Most people (including me) will agree that life has to be capable of reproduction. As such viruses are not considered to
be alive. They contain only blueprints for their own structure and needs a host capable or reading and executing the RNA
code to produce new units. I believe no one knows where viruses initially came from.
If that is the only requirement for life though then a robot capable of building a replica of itself would be considered
alive. Does life then have to be organic? I refuse to add this condition to the definition with the intention of
excluding the robot without a properly good reason. I also refuse to consciously look for a good reason In order to
exclude it.
Another condition is to be able to respond to stimuli. I will assume the definition of stimuli to be "a change in the environment". Give the robot sensors and a well written software to avoid hurting nearby "softer" forms of life and I think we effectively passed this one. Letting the robot respond to commands either electronic or vocal in any way we wish is no feat for today's technology.
I want you to give your own definition, comment mine, add or remove anything you would like to. But please explain why you do so. This topic was not supposed to be related to any anime or manga but I suddenly recall the relevance in Ghost In The Shell and Time of Eve.
Side note: I told the Religion and Science board I considered creating a thread about difficult ethical questions, If I
come up with some good Idea, that thread will be posted in this board.
[EDIT]: The thread has been posted in General Discussion "Difficult ethical questions."