Putting aside the fact that emotions make people happy and joyful, I read another string about 9/11 and how many people were grieving over the catastrophe, and most recently the earthquake or flood coming from the East.
Can somebody remind me why everyone was crying and being upset over everything that does not affect them directly?
It's not a question of insensitivity, being sensitive in the world today is bad anyway since it mostly means you're going to lose your job, at least where the highest paying jobs of the world are concerned only results matter. If someone you don't know dies, it does not affect you. But if an entire building collapsed and the news showed it crumbling. . people at home will be shocked and dismayed, at least showing some sign of being affected. The gravity is different but realistically. . it's just people you don't know that are dying. Logically you should not be affected.
Point of the matter is it's still people dying that you have no personal idea about or relationship with. I do not see why they even bother to feel anything, I'm sure many others could care less either and the most relevant topic to this is suicide of a person or colleague you know or work with.
If the guy chooses to kill himself, let him and move on. I don't get why people become upset over it and for some, even after 15 years they are still upset over it.
I see nothing positive about this at all, emotionally affected or not, you don't tie
an anchor to your leg before you run a race. But since I can't see things very well in this way. . (because women
can explain emotions a whole lot better than guys), I was hoping if maybe someone could enlighten the other half of us
who have no idea why being emotional is really worth the trouble. I am also positive there is a good explanation on why
people become sad and upset over things not directly affecting themselves which has nothing to do with not being
self-centered.
Spoiler (show)